Renault Megane 2018 vs Ford Focus 2018
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 260 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Renault Megane engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford Focus. Despite the higher power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Used also on Ford C-Max | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Renault Megane engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Renault Megane 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 507 litres | 608 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1504 litres | 1653 litres | |
Ford Focus has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 101 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 149 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Focus, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`881 | 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Renault Megane has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Focus, so Renault Megane quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 11 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Ford Focus has
| |