Renault Megane 2016 vs Kia Ceed 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 25 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Megane consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 5 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 395 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1247 litres | 1291 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.2 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`841 kg | 1`880 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`205 kg | 1`313 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 636 kg | 567 kg | |
| Renault Megane load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Kia Ceed. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |