Renault Megane 2016 vs Kia Ceed 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Megane engine produces 25 HP less power than Kia Ceed. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 5 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 395 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1247 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Megane has 11 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`841 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |