Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 53 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
3.7
4.9
Real fuel consumption:
5.3 l/100km
6.3 l/100km
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60.
Fuel tank capacity:
47 litres
68 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
1270 km in combined cycle
1380 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway
1580 km on highway
880 km with real consumption
1070 km with real consumption
Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Dimensions
Length:
4.63 m
4.63 m
Width:
1.81 m
1.87 m
Height:
1.45 m
1.48 m
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane and Volvo V60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:
521 litres
430 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down
1504 litres
no data
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 91 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter:
12 meters
11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo V60, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Renault Megane has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V60, so Renault Megane quality could be a bit better.
