Renault Megane 2016 vs Volvo V60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 53 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1380 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1580 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1070 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller. Renault Megane and Volvo V60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1504 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 91 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo V60, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`932 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Renault Megane has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V60, so Renault Megane quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |