Renault Megane 2016 vs Kia Ceed 2018

 
Renault Megane
2016 - 2018
Kia Ceed
2018 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 110 HP136 HP
Torque: 250 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds10.1 seconds
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving.
Renault Megane engine produces 26 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.74.3
Real fuel consumption: 5.3 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1270 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1210 km on highway
880 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Engine production duration: 14 years15 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Dacia DusterInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Kia Ceed engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ...  More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.60 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 3 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 521 litres625 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1504 litres1694 litres
Kia Ceed has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 190 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.4 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`932 kgno data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Kia Ceed has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably better
Average price (€): 800011 600
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Kia Ceed has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv