Renault Megane 2016 vs Fiat Tipo 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Fiat Tipo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 10 HP less power than Fiat Tipo, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Fiat Tipo. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 3.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Megane consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1470 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Tipo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 6 cm longer than the Fiat Tipo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1504 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.1 metres more than that of the Fiat Tipo, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`932 kg | 1`940 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`320 kg | 1`390 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 612 kg | 550 kg | |
| Renault Megane load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Fiat Tipo. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |