Renault Megane 2010 vs Volvo C70 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 40 HP more power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo C70. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2010 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Megane 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Renault Megane is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Megane is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 200 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 11 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. The Volvo C70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`926 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
| |