Renault Megane 2010 vs Mazda MX-5 2009

 
Renault Megane
2010 - 2012
Mazda MX-5
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 180 HP160 HP
Torque: 300 NM188 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds7.6 seconds
Renault Megane engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda MX-5, whereas torque is 112 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Despite the higher power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.17.6
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Mazda MX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway840 km on highway
680 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Megane) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 15 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Grand EspaceInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Renault Megane engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.02 m
Width: 1.81 m1.72 m
Height: 1.43 m1.26 m
Renault Megane is larger.
Renault Megane is 46 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 18 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 211 litres150 litres
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity.
Renault Megane has 61 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9261`375
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Mazda MX-5 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda MX-5, so Mazda MX-5 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 7600no data
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mazda MX-5 has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv