Renault Megane 2010 vs Mazda MX-5 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 160 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 188 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
Renault Megane engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda MX-5, whereas torque is 112 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Despite the higher power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
The Mazda MX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
680 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Megane) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Grand Espace | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Renault Megane engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Renault Megane 2010 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Megane 2010 2.0 engine Mazda MX-5 2009 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.26 m | |
Renault Megane is larger. Renault Megane is 46 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 18 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 150 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 61 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`926 | 1`375 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Mazda MX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda MX-5, so Mazda MX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 8600 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |