Renault Megane 2006 vs Mazda 3 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Renault Megane engine produces 4 HP less power than Mazda 3, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
1460 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
1070 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.21 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Renault Megane is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | 635 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 555 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`825 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |