Renault Megane 2012 vs Peugeot 308 2011
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 106 HP | 156 HP | |
Torque: | 151 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Peugeot 308 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 50 HP less power than Peugeot 308, whereas torque is 89 NM less than Peugeot 308. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.7 | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 308, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 25 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Peugeot 308 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 2 cm longer than the Peugeot 308, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 348 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | 1201 litres | |
Renault Megane has 20 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 308. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 308 (by 39 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 308. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`870 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Peugeot 308 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Peugeot 308, so Peugeot 308 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3800 | 4200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Peugeot 308 has
| |