Renault Laguna 2010 vs Mazda 6 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Laguna) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda 6) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 193 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 45 HP less power than Mazda 6, but torque is 47 NM more than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 1130 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 6 2010 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger, but lower. Renault Laguna is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Laguna is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1751 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 11 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`957 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |