Renault Laguna 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2012
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is more dynamic to drive. Renault Laguna engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Grand Scenic, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Thanks to more power Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.1 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Laguna consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Laguna could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Espace | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2010 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Laguna 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.65 m | |
| Renault Laguna is 12 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 645 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 450 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`961 | 2`203 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |