Peugeot 407 2004 vs Ford Mondeo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 407 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 407 engine produces 46 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Peugeot 407 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 407 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 407 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 407 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
| Peugeot 407 is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 407 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | 1700 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Peugeot 407 has 133 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 335 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 407 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Peugeot 407 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`183 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 407 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |