Peugeot 407 2004 vs Ford Mondeo 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 407 engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 407 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 407 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 407 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 407 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Galaxy, Ford C-Max, Ford S-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 407 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Peugeot 407 is smaller. Peugeot 407 is 7 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 407 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 554 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | 1745 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Peugeot 407 has 147 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 380 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 407 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Peugeot 407 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`183 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 407 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 407 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |