Peugeot 206 1998 vs Peugeot 307 2002
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 307 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 20 HP less power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Peugeot 307. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Peugeot 206 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 306, Citroen Xsara Picasso, Peugeot 106 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 307 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 60 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 1540 litres | |
|
Peugeot 307 has more luggage space. Peugeot 206 has 95 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 307. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`525 | 1`923 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Peugeot 206 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 307, so Peugeot 206 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |