Opel Omega 1994 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 211 HP | 115 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 270 NM | 167 - 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 15 seconds | 9.2 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.0 | 8.5 - 12.8 | |
|
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Opel Omega is smaller, but higher. Opel Omega is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`195 | ~ 1`726 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |