Opel Mokka 2012 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Opel Mokka and Nissan Qashqai have the same engine power, but Opel Mokka torque is 20 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Mokka consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is smaller, but higher. Opel Mokka is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Opel Mokka has 74 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 213 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests, but Nissan Qashqai is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |