Opel Mokka 2020 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is more dynamic to drive. Opel Mokka engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, but torque is 23 NM more than Mazda CX-3. Despite less power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.7 | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Mokka consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 2018: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Opel Mokka 2020 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Opel Mokka 2020 1.2 engine Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.54 m | |
| Opel Mokka is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1105 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |