Opel Mokka 2015 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 20 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is smaller, but higher. Opel Mokka is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1372 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`883 kg | 1`960 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`374 kg | 1`365 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 509 kg | 595 kg | |
| Opel Mokka load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Nissan Qashqai is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests, but Nissan Qashqai is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |