Opel Mokka 2016 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 35 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.7 | |
| Opel Mokka consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 2018: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Astra | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.54 m | |
| Opel Mokka and Mazda CX-3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Opel Mokka has 6 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 112 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`764 | 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |