Opel Astra 2003 vs Skoda Octavia 2004
Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 147 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Opel Astra is more dynamic to drive. Opel Astra engine produces 1 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, but torque is 1 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Opel Astra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Astra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that by driving the Opel Astra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Astra consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Meriva | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Toledo | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Skoda Octavia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Skoda Octavia 2004 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Skoda Octavia 2004 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
Opel Astra is smaller. Opel Astra is 30 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Astra is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 560 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1350 litres | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Opel Astra has 230 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Astra is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Opel Astra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`695 | 1`915 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Opel Astra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Octavia, so Opel Astra quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Astra has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |