Nissan Juke 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 85 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.7 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2008 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Qashqai engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2008 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 251 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | 1520 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 734 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 2`072 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |