Nissan Juke 2014 vs Nissan Qashqai 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 51 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.0 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 21 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
786 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 223 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 799 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`870 kg | 1`885 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`394 kg | 1`315 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 476 kg | 570 kg | |
| Nissan Juke load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Nissan Qashqai is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |