Nissan Juke 2014 vs Nissan Qashqai 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 27 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 24 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
506 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 179 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 1079 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`885 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`356 kg | 1`315 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 524 kg | 570 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |