Nissan Juke 2014 vs Nissan Qashqai 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 46 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Juke consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Juke engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 24 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 215 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`885 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |