Nissan Juke 2010 vs Dacia Duster 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 5 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Dacia Duster. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 18 cm shorter than the Dacia Duster, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 475 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1604 litres | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 224 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Duster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 774 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Juke scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |