Nissan Juke 2014 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 218 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 280 NM | 165 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 12 seconds | 8.9 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.4 | 4.4 - 7.7 | |
|
Nissan Juke petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Nissan Juke equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 24 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1189 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 76 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 396 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`924 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 10 000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |