Mitsubishi Pajero 1991 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 91 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 56 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 40 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Pajero engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 2.07 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller. Mitsubishi Pajero is 34 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`650 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |