Mitsubishi Pajero 1996 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 181 HP | 91 HP | |
Torque: | 255 NM | 188 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 90 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 32 years | 27 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Mitsubishi Pajero engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 5.00 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 2.07 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller. Mitsubishi Pajero is 27 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 18 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`650 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4400 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |