Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 91 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 9 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 2.07 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller. Mitsubishi Pajero is 74 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |