Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 17 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 465 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 8 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |