Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 24 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 525 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2006 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2006 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 8 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |