Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 132 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 164 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 5.8 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 7.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 1140 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1585 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 10 000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |