Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 585 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |