Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 40 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 885 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1585 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 10 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |