Mitsubishi Pajero 1996 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 91 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 8 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 2.07 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller. Mitsubishi Pajero is 30 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |