Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 91 HP | |
Torque: | 292 NM | 188 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 104 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 27 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 5.00 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 2.07 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller. Mitsubishi Pajero is 30 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 17 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2800 | 12 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |