Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Land Rover Discovery 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 28 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.94 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1970 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |