Mercedes Vito 2010 vs Toyota Sienna 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 266 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 392 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes Vito engine produces 171 HP less power than Toyota Sienna, whereas torque is 142 NM less than Toyota Sienna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Sienna) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is smaller, but higher. Mercedes Vito is 8 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 730 litres | 993 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3810 litres | |
|
Toyota Sienna has more luggage space. Mercedes Vito has 263 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Sienna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Sienna, which means Mercedes Vito can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |