Mazda CX-7 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-7 engine produces 23 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-7 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.5 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-7 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-7 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-7 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2010 2.2 engine: The Honda N22B diesel is generally considered a successful and durable engine. Its main weak points are connected with the fuel system, emissions components, cold-weather operation, and several intake and exhaust-related parts.
One of the most frequent complaints concerns the injectors. Depending on the version, owners report problems with sensitive piezo injectors, while Bosch injectors themselves are usually ... More about Honda CR-V 2010 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-7 is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-7 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
774 litres | 1532 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 758 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-7 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda CX-7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | 2`160 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`800 kg | 1`713 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 630 kg | 447 kg | |
| Mazda CX-7 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Mazda CX-7 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-7 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |