Mazda 6 2012 vs Mercedes E class 2013

 
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Mercedes E class
2013 - 2014
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol3.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 192 HP252 HP
Torque: 256 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds7.4 seconds
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 60 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 84 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.37.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.0 l/100km10.4 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1000 km on highway
770 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 12 years15 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-5Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.88 m
Width: 1.84 m1.85 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 and Mercedes E class are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 489 litres540 litres
Mercedes E class has more luggage space.
Mazda 6 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`390
Safety:
Mercedes E class is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 6 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes E class has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 700016 800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mercedes E klase has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv