Mazda 6 2012 vs Mazda 6 2015

 
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 165 HP150 HP
Torque: 210 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds9.5 seconds
Mazda 6 2012 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 2012 engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda 6 2015, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.0
Mazda 6 2012 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1260 km on highway1290 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 12 years12 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.87 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2012 and Mazda 6 2015 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 489 litres438 litres
Mazda 6 2012 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 2012 has 51 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2015.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2012 is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6 2015, which means Mazda 6 2012 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`935
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 660017 800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv