Mazda 6 2015 vs Mazda 6 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 2012 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 2015 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 6 2012, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 2015 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.9 | |
| Mazda 6 2015 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2015 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2015 and Mazda 6 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 489 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 2012 has more luggage space. Mazda 6 2015 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2015 is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2012, which means Mazda 6 2015 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`935 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 6 has
| |