Mazda 6 2008 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 147 HP105 HP
Torque: 184 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds11.7 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 42 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.16.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.8 l/100km
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway960 km on highway
790 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda MX-3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mazda 3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Mazda 6 2008 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ...  More about Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.42 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.46 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 6 is 34 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litres635 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 210 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 1067 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9501`725
Safety:
Quality:
above average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 26001800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Mazda 3 has
  • timing belt engine
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv