Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Land Rover Freelander) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Yeti) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 37 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, but torque is 110 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 16 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |