Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 27 HP more power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Maverick. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 11.1 | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |