Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 28 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 16 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |