Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Land Rover Freelander 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander 2002 is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander 2002 engine produces 15 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander 1998, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Land Rover Freelander 1998. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander 1998 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Freelander 2002 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 1998, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Freelander 2002 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 1998. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander 2002 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Rover 25, Rover 45 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander 1998 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander 2002 and Land Rover Freelander 1998 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Land Rover Freelander 2002 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander 1998 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander 2002, so Land Rover Freelander 2002 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |