Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Opel Frontera 2001

 
Land Rover Freelander
2002 - 2003
Opel Frontera
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 112 HP120 HP
Torque: 260 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.4 seconds14.5 seconds
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 8 HP less power than Opel Frontera, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Opel Frontera. Despite less power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.68.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway940 km on highway
710 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years4 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Omega, Opel Sintra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Frontera might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.27 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.76 m1.69 m
Land Rover Freelander is larger.
Land Rover Freelander is 11 cm longer than the Opel Frontera, 1 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data320 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1137 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Opel Frontera, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`300
Safety:
Quality:
average

below average
Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Frontera has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably better
Average price (€): 20002200
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Frontera has
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv