Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Freelander) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Maverick) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Maverick is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 38 HP less power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 60 NM more than Ford Maverick. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |