Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Land Rover Freelander 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander 1998 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander 2002 engine produces 3 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander 1998, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Land Rover Freelander 1998. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.2 | |
| Land Rover Freelander 2002 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander 2002 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander 2002 and Land Rover Freelander 1998 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Land Rover Freelander 2002 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander 1998 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander 2002, so Land Rover Freelander 2002 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |